he special place of property in the daily life of human beings is of special importance and prominence among other issues, so much so that in the divine schools and even non-divine systems, it is a fundamental and certain principle for regulating the social and economic More
he special place of property in the daily life of human beings is of special importance and prominence among other issues, so much so that in the divine schools and even non-divine systems, it is a fundamental and certain principle for regulating the social and economic relations of society. It is the most famous jurisprudential rule and has long been one of the most basic rules of Islamic jurisprudence due to its extensive economic and social application. This rule establishes the pillars of ownership in conflict with the subject of ownership and the rule of domination with the public interest. Most believe that the principle of preference for public rights and collective interests It restricts the scope of domination and is in conflict with these two public interests. However, some views in the rule of domination refer to the collective and do not infer conflict with the public interest. The present study focuses on ownership based on the rule of domination and the rule of public interest The growing complexity of people's lives and social relationships, which limit the rule of domination in conflict with the public interest and even deprivation of property, has been processed so that no one has entered as above.
Manuscript profile
The term “privatization” has not been defined in our laws. Privatization is a complicated and vague concept featuring various political, social, economic and legal aspects and outcomes. Before and after the Islamic Revolution, our legislator’s approach has been towards More
The term “privatization” has not been defined in our laws. Privatization is a complicated and vague concept featuring various political, social, economic and legal aspects and outcomes. Before and after the Islamic Revolution, our legislator’s approach has been towards the domination of public and state ownership. But, a larger deal of attention was gradually paid to privatization due to numerous reasons such as domestic and foreign factors including the prevention of public and state sectors’ monopoly, stagnation of the society, downsizing of the government, valuing the private sector and entry to global trade and markets. The objective and distinct examples of such an approach is the Act 44 of the constitution and Islamic Republic of Iran’s first to sixth economic, social and cultural development plans. The most important objective of privatization has been enhancement of the entities’ efficiency and optimization of resource allocation in the majority of the countries. Valuing the privatization is in fact supplementing the state and public proprietorship. Such an overlap can remove the gaps and impediments and concomitantly put into effect all the national talents and competencies. The present study aims at elaboration of the adopted by value – legal analysis of Islamic Republic of Iran’s governance approach towards the process and concept of privatization.
Manuscript profile
